With so much evidence supporting the flat Earth theory, why aren't more resources dedicated to studying it?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:40
Because this “evidence” that you imagine simply doesn’t exist - and yet the amount of evidence (indeed PROOF) that it’s nonsense is an enormous mountain:
No Flat Earther has EVER explained the motion of the Sun and Moon around their flat earth model that can explain sunrise and sunset times all around the world.
This is direct evidence. No complicated thinking-about-it things to worry your tiny brains.
Kelsey Parker announces loss of newborn baby Phoenix - BBC
Just one person (like me) can provide at least two dozen disproofs of the Flat Earth - and at least another two dozen consequences that we’d EASILY be able to spot if the Earth was actually flat.
To pick just two things:
Now - there is NO piece of so-called evidence that you can provide that I cannot disprove. Try it. Post a piece of so-called flat-earth evidence in comments below - and I can single-handedly disprove it.
Rocket Report: Northrop backs Firefly and names its rocket; Xodiac will fly no more - Ars Technica
No Flat Earther has EVER explained how a simple magnetic compass works in the southern hemisphere (or the region beyond the equatorial circle in their own maps).
There’s a reason for that - it is literally, mathematically and geometrically impossible to do that other than on a sphere.
So - there you go. Two disproofs that no flat earther can explain.
Your only defense against those claims is to yell “FAKE” or “CONSPIRACY”…but without any real reason why anyone would fake it - or what the conspiracists have to gain from this insanely difficult set of operations.
We have several hundred people who flew to space and saw it with their own eyes.
We have photos of the round earth taken by many hundreds of satellites - owned by many different governments AND by many companies AND (with “cubesats”) by kids in college.